From Formal Recognition to Substantive Recognition: Citizenship Challenges of Confucianism in Post–New Order Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v5i1.85Keywords:
Confucianism, Politics of Recognition, Citizenship, Minority Religion, Religious FreedomAbstract
This study aims to analyze the gap between formal recognition and substantive recognition of Confucianism in post–New Order Indonesia. Although the state has officially re-recognized Confucianism as a recognized religion since the Reformasi era, its adherents continue to face various challenges related to administrative services, social acceptance, and citizenship equality. This study employs a qualitative approach through a literature review of academic publications, legal documents, state regulations, population data, and previous studies on Confucianism, the politics of recognition, religious freedom, and citizenship in Indonesia. Using Charles Taylor’s politics of recognition perspective, this study identifies four major findings. First, the position of Confucianism within Indonesia’s legal system has undergone historical dynamics characterized by recognition, marginalization, and re-recognition. Second, the formal recognition granted by the state has not fully produced substantive recognition in public services and civil administration practices. Third, various forms of social racism and historical stigma against the Chinese-Confucian community persist despite the abolition of discriminatory state policies. Fourth, the Confucian community has developed various resilience strategies through institutional adaptation, education, social participation, and identity negotiation to maintain its presence within Indonesia’s public sphere. This study demonstrates that legal recognition does not always correspond directly to the realization of citizenship equality. Therefore, broader efforts are necessary to strengthen substantive recognition through policy reform, inclusive public services, and greater social acceptance of minority religious groups. As an original contribution, this study offers an interpretation of the Confucian community’s experience as an example of how recognition operates as a gradual, multilayered, and continuously negotiated process within Indonesia’s multicultural society.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2012). Kewarganegaraan Suku Bangsa Agama dan Bahasa Sehari-hari Penduduk Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2012/05/23/55eca38b7fe0830834605b35/kewarganegaraan-suku-bangsa-agama-dan-bahasa-sehari-hari-penduduk-indonesia
Bonasir, R. (2010). Warga Kong Hu Cu protes terkait KTP. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2010/02/100219_ktpkonghucu
Butt, S. (2020). Constitutional recognition of beliefs in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Religion, 35(3), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.39
Chambert-Loir, H. (2015). Confucius Crosses the South Seas. Indonesia, 2015(99), 67. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.99.0067
Chan, C. (2013). “Assimilationism” versus “Integrationalism” Revisited: The Free School of the Khong Kauw Hwee Semarang. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 28(2), 329. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj28-2f
Coppel, C. A. (1983). Indonesian Chinese in Crisis. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th ed,. SAGE Publications.
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review, 2(3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.64590/pup
Hoon, C.-Y. (2008). Chinese Identity in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Culture, Politics and Media. Sussex Academic Press.
Hukumonline.com. (2020a). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 1967 tentang Agama Kepercayaan dan Adat Istiadat Cina. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/lt51cbd78fd5428/instruksi-presiden-nomor-14-tahun-1967/document/
Hukumonline.com. (2020b). Penetapan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1965 tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan/atau Penodaan Agama. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/26390/penetapan-presiden-nomor-1-tahun-1965/
Irwansyah, Soehadha, M., & Buddin SM, M. M. (2025). Religious Syncretism as a New Model for Interreligious Harmony: A Study of Tridharma in Indonesia. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106.4. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.4024
JDIH BPK. (2000). Keputusan Presiden (KEPPRES) No. 6 Tahun 2000 Pencabutan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 14 Tahun 1967 Tentang Agama, Kepercayaan, Dan Adat Istiadat Cina. JDIH BPK. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/57713/keppres-no-6-tahun-2000
Kementerian Agama RI. (2024). Ikhtiar Kemenag Bina Umat Khonghucu. Kementerian Agama RI. https://kemenag.go.id/nasional/ikhtiar-kemenag-bina-umat-khonghucu-xln2jo
Kementerian Agama RI. (2025). Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Agama. Kementerian Agama RI. https://satudata.kemenag.go.id/dataset/detail/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-agama
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Clarendon Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2003). Multicultural States and Intercultural Citizens. Theory and Research in Education, 1(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001002001
Kymlicka, W. (2020). Multicultural Citizenship. In The New Social Theory Reader (pp. 270–280). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963-44
Lakonawa, P., Kristan, Meneses, K., Hepi Witono, P., Jodis, J., Mangatur Tampubolon, S., & Siallagan, J. (2023). The mitigating responses of confucian religious institutions to the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 464, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346401002
Lestari, S. (2010). Hak sipil umat Kong Hu Cu terabaikan. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2010/02/100214_imlek_tangerang
Lindsey, T., & Pausacker, H. (2005). Chinese Indonesians: Remembering, distorting, forgetting. ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812305442
Long, N. J. (2019). ‘Straightening What’s Crooked’? Recognition as Moral Disruption in Indonesia’s Confucianist Revival. Anthropological Forum, 29(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2019.1664984
Marini, H. (2013). Umat Konghucu diimbau tak ragu cantumkan agama di KTP. Antara News. https://bengkulu.antaranews.com/berita/10899/umat-konghucu-diimbau-tak-ragu-cantumkan-agama-di-ktp
Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2012). How does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2011.618266
Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosm129
Samosir, L., Djunatan, S., Haq, M. Z., & Viktorahadi, R. F. B. (2023). Kiat Sukses Menulis Karya Ilmiah bagi Mahasiswa. Gunung Djati Publishing.
Sidik, M. D. H., & Setia, P. (2024). Revisiting the Concept of Peace: A Sociological Perspective. Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies, 3(1), 11–20.
Sukirno, & Natalis, A. (2025). Majority bias in legal politics. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 15(1), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl/2146
Suprajitno, S. (2019). Various petals of the lotus: The identities of the Chinese buddhists in Indonesia. Archiv Orientalni, 87(2), 333–358. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85075731420
Suryadinata, L. (2003). Kebijakan negara Indonesia terhadap etnik Tionghoa: Dari asimilasi ke multikulturalisme? LP3ES.
Tambunan, I. (2012). Warga Konghucu Masih Sulit Urus KTP. Kompas.Com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2012/05/17/17195218/warga-konghucu-masih-sulit-urus-ktp
Tanasaldy, T. (2022). From Official to Grassroots Racism: Transformation of Anti‐Chinese Sentiment in Indonesia. The Political Quarterly, 93(3), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13148
Taylor, C. (1994). The Politics of Recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dilawati & Sidik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
Share - copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/















