The Dual Faces of Religion: Tolerance and Intolerance in a Sociological Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v4i1.63Keywords:
Religious Discourse; Tolerance and Intolerance; Socio-Political Context; Media and Religion; Sociology of ReligionAbstract
This study aims to explore the dual role of religion in contemporary society—as both a source of tolerance and a driver of intolerance—by critically analyzing the socio-political, cultural, and global contexts that shape religious discourse. The research responds to the urgency of understanding religion beyond theological essentialism, emphasizing the need for a sociological approach to interpret the contradictory manifestations of religion in plural societies. Employing a qualitative design through critical literature review, the study analyzes academic texts and discourse on religion using thematic content analysis. The data sources include influential works by Diana Eck, John Hick, Mark Juergensmeyer, Karen Armstrong, Jeremy Menchik, Robert Hefner, and others. The findings reveal three significant patterns: religion as a moral force fostering interfaith dialogue; religion as an ideological tool legitimizing social exclusion; and the ambivalent image of religion shaped by state politics, popular media, and transnational religious networks. The study demonstrates that religion is never neutral—it is continuously constructed and contested within power relations, identity politics, and symbolic representation. These insights underscore the functional and dysfunctional roles of religion in shaping social cohesion and polarization. The implications of this research highlight the urgency of promoting critical religious literacy, interfaith education, and inclusive public policies that prevent the instrumentalization of religion for sectarian or authoritarian interests. The originality of this study lies in its multidimensional mapping of the social construction of religion, shifting the analytical lens from sacred texts to contextual forces. By integrating classic sociological theories with the Indonesian context, this research offers a comprehensive and contextually grounded contribution to the sociology of religion.
References
Abdillah, M. (2019). Agama dan Perdamaian: Kontribusi Agama dalam Menangkal Radikalisme. Pustaka Indonesia.
Al-Kubise, A. A., & Haq, Z. U. (2023). Addressing Religious Intolerance in Multi-Faith Societies. Unspecified Journal.
Altınoğlu, E. (2018). The Impact of Religious Orientations upon Social Tolerance in Turkey. Unspecified Journal.
Armstrong, K. (2014). Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence. Knopf.
Bamualim, C. S. (2015). Islamisasi, Politik dan Aliran Kebatinan di Pedesaan Jawa Barat. In J. Millie & D. Syarif (Eds.), Islam dan Regionalisme (pp. 45–62). Pustaka Jaya.
Barth, H.-M. (2014). Religions and Tolerance. Unspecified Publisher.
Beneke, C., & Grenda, C. S. (2011). The First Prejudice: Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Early America. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Berger, P. L. (2015). The sacred canopy. In Sociology of religion (pp. 21–26). Routledge.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (Issue 10). Penguin Uk.
Bush, E. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics. In Politics, Religion & Ideology (Vol. 13, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2012.659491
Carlile, A., Galbraith, Q., & White, B. (2020). Religion as a Source of Tolerance and Intolerance. Unspecified Journal.
Cipriani, R. (2009). “Public Religion” and the Pancasila-Based State of Indonesia. An Ethical and Sociological Analysis, by Benyamin Fleming Intan. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006. ISBN-13: 9780820476032, 277 pp., hb, $67.95. Implicit Religion, 12(2), 242–244.
Crisp, B. R. (2018). Religious literacy for responding to violence and abuse involves the capacity to go beyond stereotypes. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 11(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-09-2017-0044
Cuciniello, A. (2022). Religious literacy and plural educational contexts. Ricerche Di Pedagogia e Didattica, 17(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/14353
Djunatan, S., Haq, M. Z., Viktorahadi, R. F. B., & Samosir, L. (2024). Kiat Sukses Menulis Karya Ilmiah Bagi Mahasiswa. Gunung Djati Publishing.
Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford University Press.
Eck, D. L. (2001). A New Religious America: How a “Christian Country” Has Become the World’s Most Religiously Diverse Nation. HarperSanFrancisco.
Finke, R., Martin, R. R., & Fox, J. (2017). Explaining discrimination against religious minorities. Politics and Religion, 10(2), 389–416.
Finke, R., & Mataic, D. R. (2021). Reconciling state promises and practices: Constitutional promises and discrimination against religious minorities. Social Compass, 68(3), 301–320.
Finucane, J., & Feener, R. M. (2014). Proselytizing and the limits of religious pluralism in contemporary Asia. Springer.
Firmanto, A. (2015). Historiografi Islam Cirebon (Kajian Manuskrip Sejarah Islam Cirebon). Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 13(1), 31–58.
Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. The Free Press.
Golovushkin, D. A. (2004). On the Issue of Religious Tolerance in Modern Russia. Unspecified Journal.
Gulen, M. F. (2014). Islam Rahmatan Lil’alamin. Republika.
Hadiwirawan, O. (2020). Exploration of Christian faith religiosity in Indonesia. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416987_009
Hanafi, Y., Saefi, M., Diyana, T. N., Ikhsan, M. A., Faizin, N., Thoriquttyas, T., & Murtadho, N. (2022). Students’ perspectives on religious moderation: A qualitative study into religious literacy processes. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(1), 7.
Haq, M. Z., & Setia, P. (2024). Maintaining Order in Religious Worship: Goffman’s Perspective–A Review Article. Focus, 5(2), 111–120.
Hefner, R. (1997). Islamization and democratization in Indonesia. In Islam in an era of nation-states (pp. 75–128). University of Hawaii Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2017). Giving satirical voice to religious conflict: The potentials of the cultural public sphere. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 30(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2017-02-03
Hoffman, M. (2020). Religion and tolerance of minority sects in the Arab world. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(2–3), 432–458.
Hurd, E. S. (2009). The politics of secularism in international relations. In The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Huriani, Y., Haryanti, E., Zulaiha, E., & Haq, M. Z. (2022). Women Religious Congregation as Driving Force Behind Alleviation of Urban Poor Nutrition. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2113599
Irawan, A. M., Samad, I. A., Nur, S., Iskandar, I., Afifuddin, A., & Syurganda, A. (2022). Arguing against Political and Religious Discriminations: Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Ahmadiyya. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights.
Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. University of California Press.
Kamaluddin, I. S., & Anggraini, M. (2021). Intoleransi Menurut Tokoh Agama Islam dan Kristen. Studia Sosia Religia, 4(1), 95–109.
Karpov, V., & Lisovskaya, E. (2008). Religious intolerance among orthodox Christians and Muslims in Russia. Religion, State & Society, 36(4), 361–377.
Komnas HAM. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Komnas HAM 2021. Komnas HAM.
Kristimanta, P. A. (2021). Grass-Roots Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Case Study of Mosintuwu Women’s School in Poso District, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene (pp. 569–590). Springer.
Kumar, K. J. (2022). Toward a Gandhian theory of communication: The ahimsa (nonviolent) way to truth and liberation. The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory, 230–243.
Kyaw, N. N. (2021). The Excuse of (Il)legality in Discriminating and Persecuting Religious Minorities: Anti-Mosque Legal Violence in Myanmar. In Asian Journal of Law and Society (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 108–131). https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.50
Lembaga Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Kasus Diskriminasi dalam Dunia Pendidikan 2020. LPAI.
Lestari, J. (2020). PLURALISME AGAMA DI INDONESIA (Tantangan dan Peluang Bagi Keutuhan Bangsa). Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v6i1.4913
Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2, 214–253.
Menchik, J. (2014). Productive intolerance: Godly nationalism in Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56(3), 591–621.
Menchik, J. (2016). Islam and democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without liberalism. In Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without Liberalism. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316344446
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Inc.
Nata, A. (2016). Islam Rahmatan lil Alamin Sebagai Model Pendidikan Islam Memasuki Asean Community. Makalah Disampaikan Pada Acara “Kuliah Tamu” Jurusan Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Senin, 7.
Noor, N. M. (2009). The future of Malay–Chinese relations in Malaysia. Peace Psychology in Asia, 161–172.
Nugroho, M. A., & Ni’mah, K. (2018). Konsep Pendidikan Islam Berwawasan Kerukunan pada Masyarakat Multikultural. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 17(2), 337–378. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol17.iss2.art8
Nurdin, A. A., Jamaludin, A. N., Supriatna, E., & Kustana, K. (2019). The dynamic of religious life: A study of conflict and integration of Ahmadiyah in Garut, Tasikmalaya and Kuningan, West Java. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 11(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i1.16931
Nurlina. (2019). Science Literacy-based Scientific Method: A study to improve science process skill of the middle school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1970–1975. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070917
Rofiqi, M. A., & Haq, M. Z. (2022). Islamic Approaches in Multicultural and Interfaith Dialogue. Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies, 1(1), 47–58.
Ruagadi, H. A., Nursinah, N., Bunga, N. I., Pelima, J. N., & Taariwuan, S. A. (2024). Social Harmony in Plural Society (Study of Social Integration Post Poso Conflict). International Journal of Health Sciences, 2(2), 767–782.
Saleh, S. P., Cangara, H., Sabreen, S., & Ab, S. (2022). Digital da’wah transformation: Cultural and methodological change of Islamic communication in the current digital age. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5(08), 2022–2043.
Schulze, K. E. (2019). The “ethnic” in Indonesia’s communal conflicts: violence in Ambon, Poso, and Sambas. In Affect, Interest and Political Entrepreneurs in Ethnic and Religious Conflicts (pp. 116–134). Routledge.
Setara Institute. (2022). Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan di Indonesia: Laporan Tahunan 2022. Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace.
Setia, P., & Haq, M. Z. (2023). Countering Radicalism in Social Media by Campaigning for Religious Moderation. Focus, 4(1), 13–24.
Setia, P., & Rosele, M. I. (2024). Digitizing Worship: Challenges of Religious Applications and Spiritual Decline in the Digital Era. TEMALI: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 7(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v7i2.39565
Setia, P., Truna, D. S., & Hannah, N. (2025). Faith in Action: Examining Religious Responses to 21st Century Socio-Economic Challenges. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 5(1).
Setyabudi, M. N. P. (2023). Esoterisme, Toleransi, dan Dinamika Keagamaan. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(1).
Severino, V. S. (2023). Discourses on Research Freedom in the Academic Study of Religion. An Overview. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 1, 1–20.
Smith, H., & Novak, P. (2009). Buddhism: A concise introduction. HarperCollins.
Sugiyono, A. G. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Supriatna, E., Syarif, D., Afrilia, A., Sundari, A., & Setia, P. (2024). A Waqf Empowerment Model Based on Benefit Analysis. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 303–319.
Sya’roni, & Supian, A. (2021). Ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an tentang Toleransi dan Korelasinya dengan Perilaku Intoleran dalam Beragama di Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 3(3), 215–225.
Syarif, D., Zulkarnain, I., & Sofjan, D. (2017). Anti Shi’ism in Indonesia: Genealogy, Development, and Methods. Harmoni, 16(1), 24–37.
Syihabuddin, A. (2021). Agama sebagai Agen Perdamaian: Refleksi Pemikiran KH. Abdurrahman Wahid. Jurnal Pemikiran Keagamaan, 9(1), 127–135.
Turner, B. S. (2011). Religion and modern society: Citizenship, secularisation and the state. Cambridge University Press.
Vajpayee, A., & Sanghani, P. (2022). Eternal Happiness and Endurance of life through Buddhism in Bhutan. British Journal of Administrative Management, 52(151), 10–23.
Wabisah, L., & Santoso, B. R. (2021). Toleransi dan Intoleransi dalam Dakwah. Al-Mishbah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 17(1), 125–136.
Walzer, M. (1999). On toleration. Yale University Press.
Weber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Beacon Press.
Zahed, I. U. M. (2021). Religious education for rohingya refugee children in Bangladesh: Purposes, prospects, and problems. In Refugee Education in South Asia: Policies and Perspectives (pp. 19–54). https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85115697005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Efendi Rahmat, Roro Sri Rejeki Waluyajati, Yeni Huriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
Share - copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
