Realizing Peace in the Digital World
Community Participation in Spreading Messages of Peace on Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v3i1.26Keywords:
pesan perdamaian, media sosial, konflik, hoaks, ujaran kebencian., Messages of peace; Social media; Conflict; Hoaxes; Hate speechAbstract
The dissemination of messages of peace on social media has a significant impact on shaping public opinion and attitudes toward social and political issues. However, there is still limited understanding of how messages of peace are disseminated and received by social media users. This research aims to explore and understand how messages of peace are disseminated and understood by social media users, as well as the factors influencing this process. A qualitative approach is used in this research with data collection procedures through online observation and in-depth interviews with 30 social media users. Data were analyzed through data restatement, data display, and data verification steps. The findings of the research indicate that social media users have various ways of disseminating messages of peace, ranging from sharing positive content to debating controversial issues with a peaceful approach. Factors such as content, social context, and user identity influence the effectiveness of messages of peace in achieving their dissemination goals. This research concludes that the dissemination of messages of peace on social media is a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors. However, with a deeper understanding of patterns and factors influencing the dissemination of messages of peace, more effective strategies can be developed to promote peace and tolerance in the online world.
References
Abdel-Fadil, M. (2019). The politics of affect: The glue of religious and identity conflicts in social media. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(1), 11–34.
Arroyave, J. (2022). Peace, Public Opinion and Disinformation in Colombia: Social Media and Its Role in the 2016 Plebiscite. In The Palgrave Handbook of Media Misinformation (pp. 63–77). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11976-7_5
Chakraborty, S. (2022). Dynamics of dialogue, cultural development, and peace in the metaverse. In Dynamics of Dialogue, Cultural Development, and Peace in the Metaverse. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85161223235
Ellison, M. (2011). Introduction: social solidarity in Europe: the fourth pillar. In Reinventing social solidarity across Europe (pp. 1–16). Policy Press.
Grunewald, P. (2021). An Integrative Approach to Building Peace Using Digital Media. In Journal of Peacebuilding and Development (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 179–193). https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620966256
Harshman, J. (2018). Developing global citizenship through critical media literacy in the social studies. Journal of Social Studies Research, 42(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.05.001
Hirblinger, A. T. (2023). Digital Peacebuilding: A Framework for Critical-Reflexive Engagement. International Studies Perspectives, 24(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac015
Holohan, A. (2019). Transformative Training in Soft Skills for Peacekeepers: Gaming for Peace. International Peacekeeping, 26(5), 556–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2019.1623677
Kester, K. (2022). Higher education peacebuilding in conflict-affected societies: beyond the good/bad binary. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 24(3), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-04-2022-0027
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 207–222.
Kušen, E., & Strembeck, M. (2018). Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections. Online Social Networks and Media, 5, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2017.12.002
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.
Ndawana, E. (2023). The Potential Role of Social Media in Peacebuilding in Zimbabwe. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 18(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166231154408
Pecorario, A. (2023). Promoting Integral Human Development and Peace in the Digital Age. In Springer Proceedings in Physics (Vol. 291, pp. 175–183). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29708-3_19
Prianto, A. L. (2022). Government, Digital Society and Industry 4.0: Connective Action Against Covid-19 Fake News. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 454, pp. 480–491). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01942-5_48
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Şahin, S. (2022). Reporting Conflict and Peace in Cyprus: Journalism Matters. In Reporting Conflict and Peace in Cyprus: Journalism Matters. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95010-1
Sexton, M. (2022). CYBER WAR AND CYBER PEACE: Digital Conflict in the Middle East. In Cyber War and Cyber Peace: Digital Conflict in the Middle East. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85152081227
Svensson, P. G. (2023). An application of the nonprofit virtual accountability index: Accountability in sport for development and peace. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(3), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21537
Vanel, Z. (2022). Digistopss digital storytelling for protection of sacred sites: A peace training implementation to raise awareness of diversity. In Dynamics of Dialogue, Cultural Development, and Peace in the Metaverse (pp. 15–29). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5907-2.ch002
Wang, D., & Dong, X. (2011). A highway for war and peace: the secretory pathway in plant–microbe interactions. Molecular Plant, 4(4), 581–587.
Zeitzoff, T. (2017). How social media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9), 1970–1991.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Zaky, Rika Dilawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
Share - copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
