Revisiting the Concept of Peace: A Sociological Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v3i1.25Keywords:
peace, sociology, conflict, reconciliation, equilibriumAbstract
In the ever-changing global context, understanding peace has become a primary focus across various disciplines, including sociology. The sociological paradigm offers a rich and relevant perspective in understanding the dynamics of conflict, reconciliation, and post-conflict development. However, there is still a need for deeper exploration of the concept of peace within the sociological context. This research aims to investigate the evolution of the concept of peace from a sociological perspective, ranging from classical to contemporary thoughts, and to explore the implications of the sociological paradigm in peace practices and policies. This study utilizes a literature review approach to gather and analyze prominent works in sociology relevant to the concept of peace. The analysis is conducted on the views of leading sociological thinkers and relevant research findings. The findings from this literature review indicate that the sociological paradigm provides profound insights into the evolution of the concept of peace, from classical thinkers such as Durkheim, Weber, and Marx, to contemporary approaches such as critical theory and feminism. The practical implications of the sociological paradigm in conflict resolution, reconciliation, and post-conflict development are also explored. This research underscores the importance of the sociological paradigm in understanding and resolving conflicts and post-conflict development. By considering the complexity of social, political, and cultural dynamics and applying a holistic and contextual approach in designing peace strategies, sociology can make a valuable contribution to promoting sustainable and inclusive peace.
References
Amirrachman, R. A. (2012). Peace education in the Moluccas, Indonesia: between global models and local interests. In UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)(nd). University of Amsterdam.
Barash, D. P., & Webel, C. P. (2013). Peace and conflict studies. Sage.
Bartos, O., & Wehr, Y. (2002). Using conflict theory. Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, J. (2013). Sociology and peacebuilding. Handbook of Peacebuilding, 159–170.
Brewer, J. D., Hayes, B. C., Teeney, F., Dudgeon, K., Mueller-Hirth, N., & Wijesinghe, S. L. (2018). The sociology of everyday life peacebuilding. Springer.
Cole, R. (1966). Structural-functional theory, the dialectic, and social change. The Sociological Quarterly, 7(1), 39–58.
Daho, G., Duclos, N., & Jouhanneau, C. (2019). Political sociology of international interventions: Peacebuilders and the ground. In Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 249–262). Taylor & Francis.
Derrida, J. (1978). Violence and metaphysics. Levinas, Phenomenology and His Critics, 88–173.
Durkheim, E. (2014). The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.
El‐Bushra, J. (2007). Feminism, gender, and women’s peace activism. Development and Change, 38(1), 131–147.
Foucault, M. (2019). Power: the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin UK.
Frezzo, M. (2011). Sociology and Human Rights in the Post‐Development Era. Sociology Compass, 5(3), 203–214.
Galtung, J. (1968). A structural theory of integration. Journal of Peace Research, 5(4), 375–395.
Giddens, A. (1989). Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. Cambridge University Press.
Herbert, B. (1972). Symbolic interactionism. University of Carolina Press, Berkley et Los.
Hoffman, B. (2017). Inside terrorism. Columbia university press.
Kinloch, G. C. (2005). Sociological Theory: Development and Major Paradigm. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 35.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.
Nets-Zehngut, R. (2007). Analyzing the reconciliation process. International Journal on World Peace, 53–81.
O’Donnell, S., & Perley, D. (2016). Toward a sociology of the reconciliation of conflicting desires. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 53(4), 474–481.
Parsons, T. (1949). The structure of social action (Vol. 491). Free press New York.
Parsons, T. (2013). The social system. Routledge.
Samudro, E. G., Saragih, H. J. R., Widodo, P., Sumantri, S. H., Anwar, S., & Malik, I. (2022). Conflict Resolution Efforts in Papua: Reconciliation Approach. Resmilitaris, 12(4), 1645–1658.
Sangidu. (2007). Literary Research: Approaches, Theories, Methods, Techniques, and Tips. West Asian Literature Publishing Section, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Gadjah Mada University.
Trimikliniotis, N. (2013). Sociology of reconciliation: Learning from comparing violent conflicts and reconciliation processes. Current Sociology, 61(2), 244–264.
Vogele, M. C. (2009). Nonviolent Action and Building a Culture of Peace. In Handbook on Building Cultures of Peace. Springer.
Waizenegger, A., & Hyndman, J. (2016). Post-conflict Aceh, Indonesia. Reconstructing Conflict: Integrating War and Post-War Geographies, 67.
Warren, K., & Cady, D. L. (1996). Bringing peace home: Feminism, violence, and nature. Indiana University Press.
Weber, M. (2019). Economy and society: A new translation. Harvard University Press.
Wendling, A. (2009). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. Springer.
Wright, J. (2004). Post-structural methodologies. Body Knowledge and Control: Studies in the Sociology of Physical Education and Health, 19–30.
Ziegenhain, P. (2010). The Aceh conflict during the new order and the following democratization process. In Arndt Graf, Susanne Schroter, Edwin Wieringa (Eds), Aceh: History, Politics and Culture, ISEAS Publishing, Singapore, 120–134.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamad Dindin Hamam Sidik, Paelani Setia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
Share - copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/